The ultimatum game — rationality vs. fairness
Accept → both profit
Reject → both get $0
Rational prediction: accept any offer > $0. Observed reality: offers below ~30% are routinely rejected.
Coca-Cola
Dynamic pricing (hot weather)
▶
Public
Outrage — abandoned
Economically sound. Socially catastrophic. The exploitation feeling when thirsty overwhelmed the price signal.
Pre-deal fairness audit
1
Switch seats mentally. From their side of the table, does this deal read as exploitation — or mutual gain?
2
Audit the opening offer. An anchor so low it signals contempt will poison the entire process, even if you later move to a fair number.
3
Show your reasoning. Unexplained terms feel arbitrary and unfair. Explained terms — even tight ones — feel legitimate.
4
Price disguise ≠ price fairness. Airlines hide disparity via "fare classes." If discovery would trigger rage, the deal may still be structurally unfair.
"A man who is not fair does not deserve to be trusted. And once you've lost the trust of your partners, the deal you saved turns out not to have been worth saving."
— Charlie Munger, paraphrased from Poor Charlie's Almanack